Explain Socrates' claim that the unexamined life is not worth living Essay

Explain Socrates claim that the unexamined emotional state-time is not outlay aliment (Apology) - Essay ExampleTherefore, Socrates claimed that for a human being to live a worthyy life, everyone should question, examine and re-examine the values of their lives daily. This paper explores the implication and the significance of the Socrates claim that the unexamined life is not worth living focusing on the Apology and Euthyphro. The words, the unexamined life is not worth living by Socrates comes from Platos Apology when Socrates is sentenced to end after being criminate of corrupting the youth and impiety. Patterson (16) posits that apology is one historical account of Socrates defense during his trial, and these words appear at the end of the Apology when Socrates is going through possible punishments for charges against him. Socrates utters these words when the jury has already found him vicious and has to decide on what kind of punishment to impose on him, which was agreed to be a death sentence. After being sentenced to death, he has to choose an alternative punishment like life sentence or exile but he declines the offer claiming that giving up philosophy would be disobedient to god. Therefore, by the unexamined life is not worth living, Socrates meant that he was ready to face death instead of living a simple life where he is not capable of examining claims of knowledge from other people, to challenge them and be able to ask them hard questions about reality. He urged people to be concerned about honor to examine themselves and others because unexamined life is not worth living (Patterson 15). The dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro revolve around the swerve of piety. Briefly, both Socrates and Euthyphro are involved in this aspect of piety. Euthyphro suggests that piety is all about prosecuting anyone who is guilty of slaying but after challenged by Socrates, he states that piety is something that is dear to gods, arguing that piety is wha t all the gods complete whereas impiety is what all the gods hate. Socrates refused to accept many popular tales about activities of gods (Patterson, 11). According to Socrates, piety represents unexamined life, which is not worth living, and as such, he was accused of creating new gods and ignoring the traditional Athens gods. Therefore, by stating that unexamined life is not worth living, Socrates was informing individuals to look within and get the true value of life by carefully analyzing their actions in order to live a happy life where no one gets hurt. Critical examination of life is necessary as it involves evaluation of events from both the ancient and present. Through this, one is able to learn from the past mistakes and correct them, watch his actions and live a more fulfilling life this is because without thorough examination of life, life is worthless. In a situation where a person fails to examine his life, he will keep on reiterate past mistakes and stagnation is i nevitable. People should try to be virtuous, try to find out and realize what they do not know in life to have a broader view of the world (Kamtekar 154). Socrates claim about unexamined life is unworthy can be seen as implying that a life without introspection, with no personal contemplation is totally a waste since lack of self-understanding and analysis is likely to lead to repetition of past mistakes and blaming others. mischance to have a deep personal understanding makes a person to live unexamined life. Moreover, lack of meaty life and progress is a waste of time it