Green criminology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Green criminology - Essay ExampleThese new categories are crimes of air pollution, crimes of deforestation, crimes of species decline and against animal rights, and crimes of peeing pollution. Crimes of deforestation Our area of consideration will focus on deforestation a category of green crime and we subject it to green criminology test. Deforestation as a crime against environment can be defined as the removal of a forest or stand of trees where the land is in that respectafter reborn to a non forest use for example conversion of forestland to agriculture or urban use. Deforestation is often misused to include any activity where on the whole trees in an area are removed but in temperate climates, the removal of all trees in an area in conformance with sustainable forestry practices is justly described as regeneration harvest (Butler, 2009). People engage in deforestation for many reasons but the removal of trees without sufficient reforestation has resulted in abuse to habit at, biodiversity loss and aridity it also bms extinction, changes to climatic conditions, desertification, and displacement of populations. Disregard or ignorance of the value, weak forest management and lack of environmental laws are some of the factors that wreak to deforestation. deforestation has a number of causes, including corruption of government institutions, the inequitable distribution of wealth and power, population growth and overpopulation, and urbanization. Globalization is viewed as another root cause of deforestation. In 2000 the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) found that deforestation can result from a combination of population pressure and stagnating economic, social and scientific conditions. According to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) secretariat, the direct cause of deforestation is agriculture. The degradation of forest ecosystems has also been traced to economic incentives that nonplus forest conv ersion appear more profitable than forest conservation. Many important forest functions have no markets, and hence, no economic value that is quick apparent to the forests owners or the communities that rely on forests for their well-being. From the perspective of the developing world, the benefits of forest as carbon sinks or biodiversity reserves go primarily to richer developed nations and there is insufficient compensation for these services. Developing countries feel that some countries in the developed world, such as the United States of America, cut down their forests centuries ago and benefited greatly from this deforestation, and that it is hypocritical to deny developing countries the same opportunities that the poor shouldnt have to bear the cost of preservation when the rich created the problem. This is one of the major problems with green crimes where the developed nations are loth(p) in implementing them (Patel-Weynand, 2002). Logging operations, which provide the wor lds wood and paper products, also cut countless trees each year. Loggers, some of them acting illegally, also make believe roads to access more and more remote forests which lead to further deforestation. New crimes and criminals here would include those who deal in the destruction of rainforests and valuable lands those who cause natural resources for their own ends and black markets that develop around the sale of many of these valuable commodities. An example of a new kind of environmental crime may be